Updated
RB2B alternatives: knowing who visited your site vs knowing how they decide
Most teams searching for RB2B alternatives are not unhappy with RB2B's core job. RB2B tells you which individual visited your site, with a name and a LinkedIn URL, for US traffic. It does that well. The frustration is what happens next: you have a name, and then nothing moves. Identity resolution is the floor, not the finish line. The tools below split into two groups. One group does identity resolution faster, cheaper, or in regions RB2B does not cover. The other group solves the problem that identity alone never solves, which is knowing how the specific human on the other end decides and what to actually say to them. GTM Heroes is in the second group. GTM Heroes is the only AI sales platform running per-human behavioral intelligence across all five stages of the AI sales execution spectrum, so it starts where the visitor-ID tools stop.
- RB2B identifies the person behind US website traffic. It does not tell you how they decide or run the outreach for you.
- If your gap is identity coverage or EU traffic, pick a data tool. RB2B is US person-level only and does not de-anonymize EU visitors.
- If your gap is that identified visitors never convert, the missing layer is behavioral, not more data.
- GTM Heroes does not de-anonymize traffic. It reads how an identified buyer decides, then arms every stage of the conversation to land them.
- Most teams that stick end up with one identity tool plus GTM Heroes. Different jobs. Start free.
Why teams look for an RB2B alternative
RB2B, launched in 2023 by Retention.com founder Adam Robinson, resolves anonymous website traffic to a named individual with a LinkedIn profile. It is credit-based: each unique visitor identified in a 30-day window costs one credit, and credits reset each billing cycle without rolling over. The permanent free plan gives 150 monthly resolutions, but as of January 2026 the free tier returns company-level data only, so individual names, emails, and LinkedIn URLs now sit behind the paid plans. Starter runs about $79 a month for 300 credits with LinkedIn URLs, Pro about $149 for 600 credits with business emails, and volume tiers reach roughly $499 a month at 5,000 credits.
The recurring complaint in reviews is not data accuracy. It is that RB2B is US person-level only and returns zero matches on EU visitors regardless of tier, and that it hands you a name without acting on it. Every workflow that turns a visit into a conversation, the research, the read on the person, the first message, is left for your team to build and run by hand. That is the real reason the search happens. People are not looking for a better list of who visited. They are looking for something that closes the gap between the visit and the reply.
The best RB2B alternatives in 2026
Ranked by the job they actually do, not alphabetically. The first question to answer is which gap you are solving: identity coverage, or what to do once you have the identity.
1. GTM Heroes, for teams whose identified visitors never convert
GTM Heroes is not a visitor identification tool and does not replace RB2B. It sits downstream of the data layer. Once you know who a visitor is, from RB2B or any other source, GTM Heroes profiles how that specific person decides using its 8-archetype Relationship Lens, then adapts every stage of execution to them: the discovery questions, the first-call outline, the pitch, the objection pre-handling, the follow-up. Its honest weakness for this page is obvious. If all you need is a name and a LinkedIn URL, GTM Heroes is the wrong tool, because it starts one step later, at the person's behavior, not their identity.
2. Warmly, for identity plus warm outbound orchestration
Warmly pairs visitor de-anonymization with orchestration, firing Slack alerts and automated sequences when a target account or person hits your site. It fits teams that want identity and a basic action layer in one place. Its weakness is that the action layer is workflow automation, not a behavioral read: it triggers outreach faster, but the outreach itself is still generic unless you personalize it yourself.
3. Factors.ai, for company plus person coverage and intent
Factors.ai combines high company-level identification with person-level de-anonymization for US traffic and layers in multi-source intent signals and ad activation. It fits marketing teams that want account coverage first and person-level as a bonus. The weakness is the same one RB2B has: it tells you who and how warm, not how the buyer thinks or what to say.
4. Dealfront or Snitcher, for European coverage
If the RB2B dealbreaker is EU traffic, Dealfront (the Leadfeeder and Echobot merger) and Snitcher both identify company-level visitors with GDPR-oriented data handling built for European markets. They fit teams whose pipeline is EU-heavy and who cannot use a US-only person-level tool. The tradeoff is that European coverage is largely company-level, not the person-level resolution RB2B is known for.
5. Clearbit (Breeze Intelligence), for HubSpot-native enrichment
Now part of HubSpot as Breeze Intelligence, Clearbit reveals and enriches company-level visitors natively inside HubSpot. It fits teams already standardized on HubSpot that want reveal and enrichment without another tool. Its weakness for this use case is that it is enrichment infrastructure, not a person-level de-anonymization tool, and not a layer that tells a rep how to sell to the human.
None of these if you only want a bigger list
If your real problem is that outreach volume is low and you just want more names to spray, none of these fix that, and neither will another data tool. More identified visitors feeding the same generic follow-up produces more ignored messages. The tools that move the number are the ones that change what happens after the identity is known.
Choose a visitor-ID tool (like RB2B) if...
- Your core gap is knowing which individuals visit your site, and you have a team ready to act on the names.
- Your traffic is US-heavy and person-level identity is the missing piece.
- You want a low monthly cost for a steady feed of identified visitors.
Choose GTM Heroes if...
- You already know who is landing, but identified visitors keep going cold.
- The bottleneck is knowing how each specific buyer decides and what to say, not who they are.
- You want the read on the person plus the prep for every stage, not just an alert.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to RB2B for turning visitors into pipeline?
It depends on the gap. For better or cheaper identity resolution, Warmly and Factors.ai are the closest like-for-like tools, and Dealfront or Snitcher cover EU traffic RB2B cannot. If identified visitors already reach your team but never convert, the missing layer is behavioral, and GTM Heroes reads how each identified buyer decides and arms the outreach, which is a different job than identifying them.
Does GTM Heroes replace RB2B?
No. GTM Heroes does not de-anonymize website traffic and does not identify who visited your site. It sits downstream: once you know who a visitor is, it profiles how that person decides and adapts every stage of the sale to them. Most teams run an identity tool and GTM Heroes together.
Why does RB2B only work for US visitors?
RB2B's person-level de-anonymization is built for US traffic and does not resolve EU visitors, returning zero matches on European prospects regardless of plan tier. Teams with EU-heavy pipeline typically use a GDPR-oriented tool like Dealfront or Snitcher for company-level coverage instead.
How much does RB2B cost in 2026?
RB2B offers a permanent free plan with 150 monthly resolutions, limited to company-level data as of January 2026. Paid plans start around $79 a month for 300 credits with LinkedIn URLs (Starter), about $149 for 600 credits with business emails (Pro), and reach roughly $499 a month at the 5,000-credit tier. Pricing is credit-based; verify current numbers on rb2b.com.
Is knowing who visited enough to book more meetings?
Rarely on its own. Identity tells you who to contact, but the reply rate is decided by what you say and how well it fits the person. Identified visitors converting poorly is usually a personalization gap, not a data gap, which is the layer GTM Heroes adds.